reg003a.idr:4:11:When checking type of Main.ECons:
No such variable OddList
reg003a.idr:7:11:When checking type of Main.OCons:
No such variable EvenList
reg003a.idr:9:6:When checking type of Main.test:
No such variable EvenList
reg006.idr:17:1:
RBTree.lookup is possibly not total due to recursive path RBTree.lookup --> RBTree.lookup
reg007.lidr:8:3:A.n is already defined
reg007.lidr:12:13-19:When checking right hand side of hurrah with expected type
        0 = 1

Type mismatch between
        n = lala (Type of isSame)
and
        0 = 1 (Expected type)

Specifically:
        Type mismatch between
                1
        and
                0
reg010.idr:5:15:
When checking left hand side of with block in usubst.unsafeSubst:
Can't match on with block in usubst.unsafeSubst warg a P x x px
reg018a.idr:16:1:
conat.minusCoNat is possibly not total due to recursive path conat.minusCoNat --> conat.minusCoNat
reg018a.idr:21:1:
conat.loopForever is possibly not total due to: conat.minusCoNat
reg018b.idr:8:1:
A.showB is possibly not total due to recursive path A.showB --> A.showB
reg018b.idr:11:1:
A.B implementation of Prelude.Show.Show is possibly not total due to: A.showB
reg018c.idr:21:1:
CodataTest.inf is possibly not total due to: with block in CodataTest.inf
reg018d.idr:8:1:Main.pull is not total as there are missing cases
reg023.idr:7:5:When checking right hand side of bad with expected type
        f Nat

Type mismatch between
        Nat (Type of 0)
and
        f Nat (Expected type)
reg028.idr:5:1:tbad.bad is possibly not total due to: with block in tbad.bad
reg028a.idr:17:14-19:
This style of tactic proof is deprecated. See %runElab for the replacement.
reg028a.idr:11:1:
tbad.qsort' is possibly not total due to: with block in tbad.qsort'
reg034.idr:6:5:When checking left hand side of bar:
Can't match on bar xs xs Refl
reg034.idr:9:5:When checking left hand side of foo:
Can't match on foo f x x Refl
reg035b.idr:8:6:No such variable __pi_arg
reg044.idr:4:6-11:
This style of tactic proof is deprecated. See %runElab for the replacement.
reg044.idr:4:4:When checking right hand side of Main.pf with expected type
        (b : Nat) -> (a : Nat) -> (S a = S b) -> a = b

Type mismatch between
        b = b (Type of Refl)
and
        a = b (Expected type)

Specifically:
        Type mismatch between
                b
        and
                a
reg049.idr:2:9:When checking constructor Main.Bogus:
Void is not Main.Foo
reg049.idr:5:6:When checking right hand side of uhOh with expected type
        Void

No such variable Bogus
./badbangop.idr:7:1: error: ! is
    not a valid
    operator, expected: space
(!) : List a -> Nat -> Maybe a 
^                              
./baddoublebang.idr:6:28: error: unexpected
    Operator without known fixity:
    !!, expected: space
doubleBang mmn = do pure !!mmn 
                           ^   
reg054.idr:18:5:When checking left hand side of inf:
When checking an application of constructor Main.MkInfer:
        Attempting concrete match on polymorphic argument: 0
reg054.idr:34:7:When checking left hand side of weird:
No explicit types on left hand side: Char
reg054.idr:37:8:When checking left hand side of weird':
No explicit types on left hand side: Nat
reg054.idr:40:1-8:When checking left hand side of tctrick:
When checking an application of Main.tctrick:
        Type mismatch between
                Maybe a1 (Type of Just x)
        and
                a (Expected type)
reg055.idr:5:3:When checking left hand side of g:
Can't match on g (f 0)
reg055.idr:8:3:When checking left hand side of h:
Can't match on h x x
reg055a.idr:8:5:When checking left hand side of foo:
When checking an application of constructor Foo.CAny:
        Attempting concrete match on polymorphic argument: Nothing
reg055a.idr:13:7:When checking left hand side of Foo.apply:
Can't match on apply (\x, y => x) a
reg056.idr:7:7:dodgy n m Refl is a valid case
reg056.idr:10:6:nonk Refl is a valid case
reg068.idr:1:6:Main.nat has a name which may be implicitly bound.
This is likely to lead to problems!
reg068.idr:2:6:Main.ze has a name which may be implicitly bound.
This is likely to lead to problems!
reg068.idr:2:8-11:WARNING: nat is bound as an implicit
	Did you mean to refer to Main.nat?
reg068.idr:2:6:When checking constructor Main.ze:
Type level variable nat is not Main.nat
Mod.idr:11:1:public export Mod.natexp can't refer to export Mod.natfn
reg070.idr:7:1:
Test_show.Te implementation of Prelude.Show.Show is possibly not total due to: Prelude.Show.Test_show.Te implementation of Prelude.Show.Show, method show
./reg076.idr:8:1: error: Missing
    fixity declaration for
    Main.:>, expected: "->", "=>",
    ambiguous use of a left-associative operator,
    ambiguous use of a non-associative operator,
    ambiguous use of a right-associative operator
<EOF> 
^     
./reg077.idr:3:1: error: Missing
    fixity declaration for
    Main.:>>, expected: ")", ";",
    "in", start of block
<EOF> 
^     
DoubleEquality.idr:4:87:When checking right hand side of oops with expected type
        Void

When checking argument value to function Prelude.Basics.the:
        Type mismatch between
                x = x (Type of Refl)
        and
                (-0.0) = 0.0 (Expected type)
        
        Specifically:
                Type mismatch between
                        -0.0
                and
                        0.0
