hspec-tidy-formatter: A custom hspec formatter for easy-to-read terminal output.

[ library, mit, testing ] [ Propose Tags ] [ Report a vulnerability ]

A custom hspec formatter for easy-to-read terminal output. For details, refer to the README.md file.


[Skip to Readme]

Flags

Manual Flags

NameDescriptionDefault
doctest

enable doctests

Disabled
isdev

development conveniences

Disabled

Use -f <flag> to enable a flag, or -f -<flag> to disable that flag. More info

Downloads

Maintainer's Corner

Package maintainers

For package maintainers and hackage trustees

Candidates

Versions [RSS] 0.1.0.0, 0.1.1.0, 0.2.0.0, 0.2.0.1
Dependencies base (>=4.17.2.1 && <5), effable (>=0.3.0.0 && <0.4), hspec-api (>=2.11.8 && <3) [details]
Tested with ghc ==9.14.1, ghc ==9.12.2, ghc ==9.10.2, ghc ==9.8.4, ghc ==9.6.7, ghc ==9.4.8
License MIT
Copyright none
Author Carl
Maintainer Carl
Uploaded by carlwr at 2026-03-09T11:28:54Z
Category Testing
Home page https://github.com/carlwr/hspec-tidy-formatter#readme
Bug tracker https://github.com/carlwr/hspec-tidy-formatter/issues
Source repo head: git clone https://github.com/carlwr/hspec-tidy-formatter
Distributions NixOS:0.1.1.0, Stackage:0.2.0.1
Downloads 27 total (11 in the last 30 days)
Rating (no votes yet) [estimated by Bayesian average]
Your Rating
  • λ
  • λ
  • λ
Status Docs uploaded by user
Build status unknown [no reports yet]

Readme for hspec-tidy-formatter-0.2.0.1

[back to package description]

hspec-tidy-formatter

A custom hspec formatter for terminal output.

License Hackage Version Stackage Nightly CI


left: this formatter, right: hspec default

Screenshot

(color choices: ©hspec  me  terminal theme)



The formatter should work with with any test runner backend. It may be particularly useful with Hedgehog tests through hspec-hedgehog: it omits the "passed 100 tests." otherwise printed after each spec item, yet includes manually added test output (Hedgehog.collect, Hedgehog.label etc.).

How to enable

With hspec-discover

Place a file SpecHook.hs in the source directory of the test component:

-- --- test/SpecHook.hs ---

import Test.Hspec
import qualified Test.Hspec.TidyFormatter as TidyFormatter

hook :: Spec -> Spec

-- use by default:
hook = TidyFormatter.use

-- to instead use only if requested (`hspec --format=tidy`):
-- hook = TidyFormatter.register

hspec --help can be used to inspect which formatters hspec is aware of:

 $ cabal test hspec --test-options=--help | grep -A3 FORMATTER

 FORMATTER OPTIONS
   -f NAME  --format=NAME     use a custom formatter; can be one of
-                             checks, specdoc, progress,
+                             checks, specdoc, progress, tidy
                              failed-examples or silent

By modifying Spec-s directly

main :: IO ()
main = hspec . TidyFormatter.use $ spec

spec :: Spec
spec = it "adds" $ 1+1 `shouldBe` (2::Int)

Functionality, options

  • supports transient output/progress

  • handles multiline spec tree strings gracefully

    • transient/progress output only prints the first line in case of multiline strings
    • the eventual non-transient output prints all lines, properly indented
  • honors most hspec options, including: --times, --no-unicode, --no-color, --print-cpu-time, --print-slow-items=[=N]

Printing of additional text from test runners

hspec allows test runners to pass it additional text together with the outcome of each test. This formatter, by default, prints such text only if it spans more than one line. To instead print all such text unconditionally, use --times (default: --no-times). This will additionally do what this option is originally supposed to do: print the execution time for spec items (if > 0 after rounding to milliseconds).

E.g. with hspec-hedgehog, which passes the number of tests run for each item as a single line of text:

- $  hspec --format=tidy
+ $  hspec --format=tidy --times

  [...]
    is Applicative-lawful per
-     [✔] Identity
+     [✔] Identity  (21ms) (passed 100 tests.)

To instead suppress the printing of any additional text from the test runner, use --expert (default: --no-expert).

Verbosity switches --[no-]expert, --[no-]times combinations

For two spec items whose test runner returns a single line, and a few lines, respectively, of additional text:

===========       =========================================
<ARGS>            `hspec <ARGS>` example output
===========       =========================================


                                             (most verbose)


-----------       -----------------------------------------
--times           [✔] Identity  (21ms) (passed 100 tests.)
--no-expert       [✔] Hedgehog generator  (49ms)
                    passed 100 tests.
                      n:   0       1% ▏···················
                      n:   1- 4    5% █···················
                      n:   5-19   16% ███▏················


-----------       -----------------------------------------
--no-times        [✔] Identity
--no-expert       [✔] Hedgehog generator
(DEFAULT)           passed 100 tests.
                      n:   0       1% ▏···················
                      n:   1- 4    5% █···················
                      n:   5-19   16% ███▏················


-----------       -----------------------------------------
--times           [✔] Identity  (21ms)
--expert          [✔] Hedgehog generator  (49ms)


-----------       -----------------------------------------
--no-times        [✔] Identity
--expert          [✔] Hedgehog generator


                                            (least verbose)

Written by a human

During the development of this package, AI models were used extensively for discussions and feedback. All code and documentation however is authored by me (Carl), a human developer: no text (code; natural language) within this package/repo is direct output from an AI model.

Since I am not a native English speaker, any natural language is likely to feature language quirks. AI models were not asked to identify or rectify such.

The above should not be understood as any opinion or even preference of mine - I both use and value development with higher degrees of AI autonomy than what was used in this project.